tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-78001512918195898472024-03-19T05:40:41.527-07:00empty corneremptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.comBlogger193125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-55990312861678517012011-01-20T08:56:00.000-08:002011-01-20T09:06:51.611-08:00We had to destroy the village in order to save itNo, really! I mean, <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/01/25-tons-of-bombs-wipes-afghan-town-off-the-map/">really</a>!<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-ucZVZSEU9x6_gPT8HyxU2vPn4-BXIxtJoauD11FdjJhTM0CFqxSDAZcV_UGpoWg3qymB70bvbKmhLKDLIJEwgq-lSv30TBvCMgmDAEWwwVGE10LJTtvoK24mY1BXNzL-2KAa22boxODg/s1600/tk.png"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 231px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-ucZVZSEU9x6_gPT8HyxU2vPn4-BXIxtJoauD11FdjJhTM0CFqxSDAZcV_UGpoWg3qymB70bvbKmhLKDLIJEwgq-lSv30TBvCMgmDAEWwwVGE10LJTtvoK24mY1BXNzL-2KAa22boxODg/s320/tk.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5564314513838973442" border="0" /></a><br /><br />This is a before and after of the village of Tarok-Kolache. Spencer Ackerman has <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/01/25-tons-of-bombs-wipes-afghan-town-off-the-map/">more</a>.emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-12102367318009002482010-12-10T20:36:00.000-08:002010-12-10T20:45:28.945-08:00Why Assange and not WoodwardStephen Walt at Foreign Policy has a good question. Why are there no calls to prosecute, assassinate or otherwise inconvenience Bob Woodward who has had a lucrative career peddling highly sensitive leaks, while the establishment (including establishment journalists) is apoplectic about Julian Assange. The answer Walt <a href="http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/12/10/more_wikileaks_double_standards">provides</a> is eminently reasonable. Woodward is an insider, a member of the elite, and:<br /><blockquote>Elites like the idea of being in charge, and they don't really trust "the people" in whose name they govern, even though it is the latter that pays their salaries, and fights their wars. Elites like the sense of power and status that being "on the inside" conveys: it's a turn-on to know things that other people don't, and it can be so darn inconvenient when the public gets wind of what the current "best and brightest" are actually doing.</blockquote>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-28393472472062548012010-12-09T19:11:00.000-08:002010-12-09T19:13:49.495-08:00Obama's journeyFrom <a href="http://www.openleft.com/diary/21074/obamas-conscience-bold-progressives-ad-strikes-deep-chord-needs-your-support">OpenLeft</a>:<br /><br /><object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4mRRKz9E0m8&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4mRRKz9E0m8&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-66529177204506555612010-11-23T19:08:00.000-08:002010-11-23T19:19:54.177-08:00Headline of the daySo the much talked about negotiations between Karzai and the Taliban with the help of NATO turns out to be a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/world/asia/23kabul.html?_r=1&hp">scam</a>. At least we got this <a href="http://www.balloon-juice.com/2010/11/23/clouseau-wept/">headline</a> out of it.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6Wxu5UUNI1vt6AmbWzFQMbrJdx-QIHD1gifKsBOV8-yKK446DvgojuCYwbUvHDztVoUCxjM3Zu2PzJ2iF4A9sMFdgpnF-f6RSGmAdZvkGZejzKzKMro2lQnGYMwTwJgFG51hPJ1KWyhYC/s1600/Untitled.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 620px; height: 97px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6Wxu5UUNI1vt6AmbWzFQMbrJdx-QIHD1gifKsBOV8-yKK446DvgojuCYwbUvHDztVoUCxjM3Zu2PzJ2iF4A9sMFdgpnF-f6RSGmAdZvkGZejzKzKMro2lQnGYMwTwJgFG51hPJ1KWyhYC/s320/Untitled.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5542949100676340066" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Stephen Walt draws some deeper <a href="http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/11/23/rule_no_1_for_afghan_nation_builders">lessons</a>:<br /><blockquote>Our strategy in Afghanistan based on "nation-building." We hope to create Afghan institutions that can run the place so we can leave. That goal, in turn, is predicated on the belief that the United States and its allies have sufficient knowledge and skill to create something that has never existed before: an effective, efficient, legitimate, Western-style state in Afghanistan. Accomplishing this task requires that we understand the underlying culture, the history, and the cross-cutting cleavages within Afghan society, and that we have sufficiently intimate knowledge of the players to know whom to work with and whom to shun.<br /><br />There was already plenty of evidence that this knowledge was lacking. After all, back in 2002 we thought Hamid Karzai was the ideal choice to lead a new Afghan government. Now, nearly eight years later, he's proven to be a disappointment (at best). And this latest fiasco merely underscores the degree to which we are out of our depth there. There's no question we can kill a lot of Taliban (or people we suspect might be Taliban, or unfortunate civilians who get in the way), but successful nation-building requires a lot more than that.<br /><br />So here's Rule No. 1 for would-be Afghan nation-builders: If you can't tell the Taliban from the imposters without a scorecard, maybe you shouldn't be playing this game.</blockquote>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-76861119929588166772010-10-28T20:30:00.000-07:002010-10-28T20:33:13.608-07:00Something pretty<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RPZjMRhLBUQ&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RPZjMRhLBUQ&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object><br />(h/t John <a href="http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2010/10/recommended-reading.html">Ballard</a>)emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-85211940919297350542010-10-23T12:18:00.000-07:002010-10-23T16:28:57.657-07:00The increasingly petulant John BurnsDocuments from the latest Wikileaks release covering the Iraq War is available at the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/iraq-war-logs">Guardian</a> and the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/war-logs.html">New York Times</a>. A lot of the information that the New York Times did not see as fit to print in real-time is available in these documents. However, the pride of place in the Time's coverage goes to a hit piece on Julian Assange, the founder and face of Wikileaks.<br />Guardian:<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBBIDHPzn2c0aDl_N0KVZmxyt-w8d2lFpS2_5yNThqScd6iydVc03k00yuJN8pQ1PaMLywCwOn9ZzNkdL-MIa7VclVtlwLjMQ-20FGOL9858D8hcfHOUppX8imUOAX6PSFpr9OBh0kRKAn/s1600/guw.png"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 198px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBBIDHPzn2c0aDl_N0KVZmxyt-w8d2lFpS2_5yNThqScd6iydVc03k00yuJN8pQ1PaMLywCwOn9ZzNkdL-MIa7VclVtlwLjMQ-20FGOL9858D8hcfHOUppX8imUOAX6PSFpr9OBh0kRKAn/s320/guw.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531334093718312146" border="0" /></a><br />New York Times:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqEfDAesv6g-_shVax49fiCmQffLp4l-WA7LUcq67XKmDNSOOSNMNJFRqplOs_csk9q04H30c7ncmOs4MpviI2efBt_Db2K4G4sq2pqThRecR2EZLOonm7lUjzAV044uVIN5Sd5MXB81hE/s1600/nytw.png"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 260px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqEfDAesv6g-_shVax49fiCmQffLp4l-WA7LUcq67XKmDNSOOSNMNJFRqplOs_csk9q04H30c7ncmOs4MpviI2efBt_Db2K4G4sq2pqThRecR2EZLOonm7lUjzAV044uVIN5Sd5MXB81hE/s320/nytw.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531334488880974114" border="0" /></a><br />The piece repeats the canard that Wikileaks previous document dump put lives in danger, despite the Pentagon's admission that no harm to anyone in Afghanistan could be tied to the Wikileaks release. As documented by the invaluable <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/10/17/wikileaks/index.html">Glenn Greenwald</a>:<br /><p></p><blockquote><p>It's been clear from the start that -- despite the valid concern that WikiLeaks should have been more vigilant in redacting the names of innocent Afghan civilians -- the Pentagon (and its media and pundit servants) were drastically exaggerating the harms, as <a href="http://mobile.salon.com/news/feature/2010/08/17/wikileaks_risks_overstated/index.html">The Associated Press noted on August 17</a>:</p> <p> </p><blockquote> <p>The WikiLeaks leak is unrivaled in its scope, but so far <strong>there is no evidence that any Afghans named in the leaked documents as defectors or informants from the Taliban insurgency have been harmed in retaliation.<br /><br /></strong></p> <p>Some private analysts, in fact, think the danger has been overstated. "I am underwhelmed by this argument. <strong>The Pentagon is hyping</strong>," says John Prados, a military and intelligence historian who works for the anti-secrecy National Security Archive. He said in an interview that relatively few names have surfaced and it's not clear whether their present circumstances leave them in jeopardy.</p> </blockquote> And on August 11, even the DOD was forced to <a target="_blank" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkpoint-washington/2010/08/pentagon_undisclosed_wikileak.html">admit to <span class="n4l-nls" style="font-style: italic;">The</span> <span class="n4l-nls" style="font-style: italic;">Washington</span> <span class="n4l-nls" style="font-style: italic;">Post</span></a> the complete absence of any evidence to support its wild accusations: "'<strong>We have yet to see any harm come to anyone in Afghanistan that we can directly tie to exposure in the WikiLeaks documents</strong>,' [Pentagon spokesman Geoff] Morrell said.</blockquote>What is interesting in the hit piece is the petulant tone of John Burns. One would have thought the pride of place would have been a mea culpa from Mr Burns explaining why the picture painted by the Wikileaks document was so different than what was conveyed by his reporting. But then, Mr. Burns is a "serious" journalist.emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-31077152536504222072010-10-22T19:18:00.000-07:002010-10-22T19:19:17.957-07:00Be afraid, be very afraid<a href="http://muslimswearingthings.tumblr.com/">Muslims wearing garb</a>.emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-33227079020183644962010-10-19T10:34:00.000-07:002010-10-19T10:40:39.788-07:00Religious nut of the dayRabbi Ovaida Josef, the religious leader of the Shas party which has four cabinet posts in the Netanyahu government again exposed the worst kept secret of all religious extremist - their contempt for the other. Thus spake the good Rabbi according to the <a href="http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?ID=191782&R=R1">Jerusalem Post</a>:<br /><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_article_control_lblArticleBody"><blockquote>“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel,” he said in his weekly Saturday night sermon on the laws regarding the actions non-Jews are permitted to perform on Shabbat.<br /><br />According to Yosef, the lives of non-Jews in Israel are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews.<br /><br />“In Israel, death has no dominion over them... With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.<br /><br />This is his servant... That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” Yosef said.<br /><br /></blockquote></span>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-22406301456539421882010-10-16T19:14:00.000-07:002010-10-16T19:21:18.230-07:00People don't like to be bombedThat the slaughter of loved ones leaves one somewhat upset at those who conducted, or facilitated, the slaughter should not come as a surprise. But perhaps it needs repeating. Chas Freeman has an article up at <a href="http://warincontext.org/">War In Context</a> that you should really read. Here are some snippets, but do go read the <a href="http://warincontext.org/2010/10/16/chas-freeman-engaging-the-middle-east-after-the-cairo-speech/#comments">whole thing</a> - and remember, this is a hard boiled realist talking:<br /><blockquote>The Middle East is a constant reminder that a clear conscience is usually a sign of either a faulty memory or a severe case of arrogant amorality. It is not a badge of innocence. These days, we meticulously tally our own battlefield dead; we do not count the numbers of foreigners who perish at our hands or those of our allies. Yet each death is a tragedy that extinguishes one soul and wounds others. This deserves our grief. If we cannot feel it, we may justly be charged with inhumanity.<br /><br />All that is required to be hated is to do hateful things. Apparent indifference to the pain and humiliation one has inflicted further outrages its victims, their families, and their friends. As the Golden Rule, common – in one form or another – to all religions, implicitly warns, moral blindness is contagious.<br />...<br />War is in fact not the spectator sport that the fans who watch it on television or on big screens in theaters imagine. Nor is it the “cakewalk” that its armchair advocates sometimes suggest it might be. War is traumatic for all its participants. Recent experience suggests that 30 percent of troops develop serious mental health problems that dog them after they leave the battlefield. But what of the peoples soldiers seek to punish or pacify? To understand the hatreds war unleashes and its lasting psychological and political consequences, one has only to translate foreign casualty figures into terms we Americans can relate to. You can do this by imagining that the same percentages of Americans might die or suffer injury as foreigners have. Then think about the impact that level of physical and moral insult would have on us. <br />...<br />No one knows how many Iraqis have died as a direct or indirect consequence of the U.S. invasion and the anarchy that followed it. Estimates range between a low of something over 100,000 to a high of well over 1 million. Translated to comparable proportions in the United States, that equates to somewhere between 1 and 13 million dead Americans. Over two-and-a-quarter million Iraqis fled to neighboring countries to escape this bloodbath. An equal number found shelter inside Iraq. Few Iraqis have been able to go back to Iraq or to return to their homes. In our terms, that equals an apparently permanent flight to Canada and Mexico of 24 million Americans, with another 24 million driven into homelessness but, years later, still somewhere inside the country. I think you will agree that, had this kind of thing happened to Americans, religious scruples would not deter many of us from seeking revenge and reprisal against whoever had done it to us.<br /></blockquote>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-53158981352415027582010-10-15T05:44:00.000-07:002010-10-15T05:46:09.561-07:00SharingAnd for something completely different (h/t<a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/"> Savage</a>):<br /><br /><object height="390" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EDeRYmB4t6Q&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EDeRYmB4t6Q&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" width="640"></embed></object>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-13019779116587011732010-10-14T18:23:00.000-07:002010-10-14T18:52:00.166-07:00Let's get stupiderIs the government in Pakistan corrupt. Most certainly. Should they do more to collect taxes from the rich and wealthy in their society. Clearly. Should the US attach strings to their aid in order to get more transparency and accountability. Assuredly. Should they do this with aid for flood relief. Are you out of your frickin mind! But that's exactly what Hillary Clinton is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703631704575552062946060780.html">proposing</a>. It seems that when Bill bonded with George, Hillary was learning a thing or two from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/07/national/nationalspecial/07barbara.html">Barbara</a>.<br /><blockquote>U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested European Union leaders should follow the U.S. and withhold further flood-relief funding from Pakistan until Islamabad shows it is doing more to fight corruption and collect tax revenue from its wealthiest citizens.</blockquote>Holding the flood ravaged refugees hostage for their government's corruption is beyond criminal. It is stupid. Though I doubt this will convince too many of the refugees to stop avoiding taxes, I am sure this statement will be received with gratitude by the Taliban. <br />Maybe it is something about <a href="http://www.stuttsuniversity.com/">Yale</a>.emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-1202743188104850162010-09-20T20:32:00.000-07:002010-09-21T07:45:30.181-07:00Marty PeretzThey say that wife beaters remain wife beaters because they can. The same is true of rich white bigots. Ta-Nehisi Coates <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/09/on-the-cheapness-of-life/63172/">nails</a> it.<br /><br /><blockquote>The fact is that Peretz has the social and economic guns to be a bigot, to then be defended by even those who acknowledge his bigotry, and finally be honored at the highest levels of American academia.</blockquote><br /><br />And there are the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/21/harvard-faces-revolt-martin-peretz">enablers</a>, sometimes known as "journalists":<br /><br /><blockquote>Howard Kurtz, the media editor of the Washington Post, was among those journalists critical of [Helen] Thomas, suggesting that she should "go home" to Lebanon and that she is a heroine to Hezbollah. Asked why the mainstream media has largely ignored Peretz's views over the years, Kurtz replied: "I'm afraid I just haven't focused on the subject."</blockquote>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-573011059605872622010-09-14T20:30:00.000-07:002010-09-14T20:33:05.432-07:00Islam and AmericaOne of the best discussions I have seen about the relationship of the US to the Muslim world and its own Muslim citizens.<br /><br /><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UE6LPV3BJQs&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UE6LPV3BJQs&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-21388712936289836512010-08-27T19:30:00.000-07:002010-08-27T19:33:57.272-07:00An embed with the TalibanNorwegian journalist Paul Refsdal succeeded in convincing a Taliban commander to let him accompany them. This is his report from Australian TV. (h/t Huffington Post)<br /><br /><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rHDCWldwRB4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rHDCWldwRB4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-32853902948534739552010-08-18T21:13:00.001-07:002010-08-18T21:20:13.050-07:00Floods in Pakistan<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsoXVtWqzthpDLW0Sq-gS2D-JGO6YCk9sloshvIJ58YKetfpxt698aBMZo9hGYipCia0rjlVuquMMSHrUxiYnwENzJKJJtP8U-6vbatuEi52-6qGVwJum88GOKgI0e-cAmY2yXWik5F1Yj/s1600/ang.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 318px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsoXVtWqzthpDLW0Sq-gS2D-JGO6YCk9sloshvIJ58YKetfpxt698aBMZo9hGYipCia0rjlVuquMMSHrUxiYnwENzJKJJtP8U-6vbatuEi52-6qGVwJum88GOKgI0e-cAmY2yXWik5F1Yj/s320/ang.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5506969427000780466" border="0" /></a>(h/t <a href="http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2010/08/can-you-say-no-to-angelina-jolie.html#trackback">Steve Hynd</a>)<br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Please <a href="http://www.interaction.org/crisis-list/interaction-members-respond-floods-pakistan">donate</a>.<br /></div>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-82734616965339717812010-08-17T18:54:00.000-07:002010-08-17T19:03:45.292-07:00Chilly down hereTwo people I never thought I would be quoting<br /><p> </p><blockquote>So please, no more talk about those idealistic neoconservatives who are willing to expend blood and treasure so Afghans and Iraqis can live free. People in Basra and Kandahar had better hope that America’s counterinsurgency warriors create a society in which they can practice their religion free of intimidation and insult. Because it’s now clear they can’t do so on the lower tip of the island of Manhattan</blockquote><p></p><blockquote> <p>And from now on, let’s stop condescending to the French about their anti-headscarf laws. Until a month ago or so, I genuinely believed that no such law could ever pass in the U.S. How naïve. After the right’s despicable performance over the last month, can anyone seriously doubt that if the U.S. had as large, and religiously traditional, a Muslim population as France, that Republicans would be clamoring for Congress to regulate their “Islamofascist” garb? Perhaps they’d merely propose that Muslim women be prohibited from wearing the headscarf within a mile of military bases that house families that have lost loved ones in the “war on terror.” We have to be sensitive, after all.</p><p>...</p><p>And oh yes, my fellow Jews, who are so thrilled to be locked arm in arm with the heirs of Pat Robertson and Father Coughlin against the Islamic threat. Evidently, it’s never crossed your mind that the religious hatred you have helped unleash could turn once again against us. Of course not, we’re insiders in this society now: Our synagogues grace the toniest of suburbs; our rabbis speak flawless English; we Jews are now effortlessly white. Barely anyone even remembers that folks in Lower Manhattan once considered us alien and dangerous, too.</p><p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-08-17/ground-zero-mosque-controversy-america-has-disgraced-itself/">Peter Beinart</a></p><p>The inclination to go from the particular to the general -- to blame a people for the acts of a few -- is what has always fueled pogroms and race riots. History shows that it is a natural tendency and it will literally run riot if not controlled. It is the solemn obligation of elected leaders to restrain such an urge -- to be moral as well as political leaders. Obama almost pulled that off, but he flinched. </p><blockquote> <p> Yes, he couldn't.<br /></p> <p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/16/AR2010081603169.html">Richard Cohen</a></p> </blockquote></blockquote><p></p>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-28779884063552034472010-08-08T20:52:00.000-07:002010-08-08T21:24:37.110-07:00The floods in PakistanNatural disasters are testing times for governments as Bush found out during Katrina. The current floods in Pakistan have been a test for the Zardari/Gilani government which it seems to have failed miserably. That it would not be able to cope with the natural disaster was a given. The poor infrastructure which is a reflection of the lack of governance made it certain that the government could not respond. Zardari compounded the problem by showing a lack of sensitivity that put Bush in Clinton territory. <br /><p></p><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/08/pakistan-floods-army-popular-zardari-anger">President Asif </a>Zardari's trip to France and Britain as the floods raged last week created an image of an indifferent, arrogant leadership, say critics. Already unpopular, Zardari faced protests on Saturday at a rally for his Pakistan Peoples party in Birmingham, with one demonstrator trying to throw a shoe at him.</p><p>"Even when governments can't cope, they can at least show empathy. That was missing," said Ayaz Amir, a newspaper columnist and member of parliament for the opposition Pakistan Muslim League (N). "Who was the first person on the scene? The army chief. This has really cost [Zardari] heavily. This image will linger.</p><p>"The image of President Zardari visiting his chateau in France, while there was devastating <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/flooding" title="More from guardian.co.uk on Flooding">flooding</a> in Pakistan: this will have long-term effects."</p><p>... images of what some have dubbed Zardari's "joy ride" have played continuously on Pakistani TV, adding to public anger.</p><br /></blockquote><p></p>Zardari's party, the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), with the help of a compliant police force, decided to shoot the<a href="http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=30602"> messenger</a>.<br /><blockquote>Transmission of Geo TV was blocked in some parts of the country and copies of The News and the daily Jang burnt in a few areas of Karachi and Sindh on Sunday as the media group gave coverage to the hurling of shoes at President Asif Ali Zardari during his party address in Birmingham.<br /><br />Many offices of cable operators in Karachi were set ablaze by angry activists of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP). Newspaper vendors were robbed of copies of The News and the daily Jang upon the direction of PPP leaders, besides, PPP workers were accompanied by police officials in hurling threats at cable operators and hawkers, sources told the media.</blockquote>While the US is trying to turn the floods into an opportunity to win hearts and minds it is not alone in this endeavor. The groups most active in relief operations are the Islamist groups which are accused of being fronts for jihadi organizations. More rains are forecast.emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-44148228315592338482010-07-25T02:30:00.000-07:002010-07-25T05:59:52.912-07:00Kayani marches onThere are several short term advantages to the extension (more a second term than an extension) granted to General Kayani as the head of Pakistan's armed forces. By all accounts he is a competent officer who is well liked by the US brass. As the US looks for an exit strategy it will be useful to have a known quantity in place in Pakistan which will likely be important to whatever strategy Washington (or more specifically the Pentagon) comes up with. Kayani served as deputy military secretary to Benazir Bhutto and so is familiar with the current president and his entourage. I am sure there is a comfort factor here for Zardari. Kayani also served as the head of the ISI which gives him familiarity with the section of the military most closely involved (to put it mildly) with the various factions in the Taliban. He has also tried to distance the military from the internal politics of Pakistan - though this might just be window dressing.<br /><br />These short term advantages may be overstated. While Kayani is competent there really is no dearth of competent officers in the Pakistan Army, including those in line to take over Kayani's job. Most of the senior officers of this generation have been trained in the US and would have no difficulty continuing the conversation with the US. While the others in line for the job do not have Kayani's ISI experience they have other experience that would come in handy. For example, the top candidate for the post Khalid Wynne has extensive experience in Baluchistan which is going to be one of the trouble spots in the coming years. He commanded the 41st Infantry Division in Quetta and headed the Southern Command in Quetta. His familiarity with the situation on the ground in Quetta may be as important as Kayani's familiarity with the Taliban. Finally, given the state of the military's reputation in Pakistan it is highly unlikely that anyone would undo Kayani's actions in trying to disentangle the military from the civilian government. As far as involvement of the military in politics the very fact of the extension is evidence of the involvement of the military in politics<br /><br />Despite any short term advantages there are several long term disadvantages to this extension. There is more than a whiff of US influence in the granting of the extension. This will make any actions Kayani takes to go after the Taliban suspicious to an already conspiracy minded Pakistani public. The extension granted to Kayani brings an end to the military careers of the officers who were up for his job. This has to generate ill will in an army that is already ambivalent about the task it is being asked to do. The suspicion of the public and the softening of support within the military will make Kayani a weaker partner for the US during his second term. Finally, this was a lost opportunity to make a hero in a country that badly needs heros. Everybody knew that an extension (if not a second term) was Kayanis for the asking. Doing a Cincinattus and accepting retirement would have cemented his reputation as an incorruptible "soldier's soldier." One of the most effective actions by a general in recent times was the resignation of the Turkish Chief of General Staff Necip Torumtay in December 1990. His resignation blocked Turkey's participation in the first gulf war and its President Turgut Ozal's ambition to redraw Turkey's boundaries to include Kirkuk and Mosul. By not accepting this extension Kayani might have served his country and his institution, and incidentally US goals, much better.emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-58490759004952521232010-06-26T06:27:00.000-07:002010-06-26T06:31:21.224-07:00Best commentary on the firing of the generalFrom <a href="http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/">whoisioz</a>:<br /><blockquote>On the other hand, I am glad to live in a world where the ongoing slaughter of civilians is a resume-builder but badmouthing the boss is a firing offense.</blockquote>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-48414958624159686902010-06-09T22:48:00.000-07:002010-06-09T22:59:07.793-07:00The Right to Impose Collective PunishmentCollective punishment has a new name the "<span style="font-weight: bold;">right</span> of economic warfare" according to an article from <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/09/95621/israeli-document-gaza-blockade.html">McClatchy</a>:<br /><p> </p><blockquote><p>Israel imposed severe restrictions on Gaza in June 2007, after Hamas won elections and took control of the coastal enclave after winning elections there the previous year, and the government has long said that the aim of the blockade is to stem the flow of weapons to militants in Gaza.</p><p>Last week, after Israeli commandos killed nine volunteers on a Turkish-organized Gaza aid flotilla, Israel again said its aim was to stop the flow of terrorist arms into Gaza. </p> <!-- story_feature_box.comp --> <!-- /story_feature_box.comp --> <p>However, in response to a lawsuit by Gisha, an Israeli human rights group, the Israeli government explained the blockade as an exercise of the right of economic warfare.</p><p>"A country has the right to decide that it chooses not to engage in economic relations or to give economic assistance to the other party to the conflict, or that it wishes to operate using 'economic warfare,'" the government said.</p></blockquote><p></p><div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"><br />The US State Department<span style="font-style: italic;"> off the record</span> said it didn't have anything to say. After three years of this:<br /><p></p><blockquote><p>Israel's blockade of Gaza includes a complex and ever-changing list of goods that are allowed in. Items such as cement or metal are barred because they can be used for military purposes, Israeli officials say.</p><p>According to figures published by Gisha in coordination with the United Nations, Israel allows in 25 percent of the goods it had permitted into Gaza before the Hamas takeover. In the years prior to the closure, Israel allowed an average of 10,400 trucks to enter Gaza with goods each month. Israel now allows approximately 2,500 trucks a month.</p><p>The figures show that Israel also has limited the goods allowed to enter Gaza to 40 types of items, while before June 2007 approximately 4,000 types of goods were listed as entering Gaza.</p></blockquote><p></p><div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">However, President Obama, eighteen months after taking office, says the situation is "unsustainable." So, everything is fine then.<br /><br /></div><br /><br /></div>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-89685883951497881472010-06-01T21:11:00.000-07:002010-06-01T21:15:57.087-07:00Lies, Damn Lies, and Israeli StatementsFrom <a href="http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0531/raw-video-reporter-claims-israelis-fired-activists-boarding-ship/">Raw Story</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>In what could be a serious blow to Israel's narrative on the killing of at least nine humanitarian activists making their way to Gaza through international waters, raw video by an Al Jazeera producer, who was filming during the raid, appears to provide evidence that the IDF opened fire on the flotilla even before boarding it.<br /><p>Israeli forces assert they came under attack by the pro-Palestine civilian group, and <a href="http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0531/israel-releases-footage-aid-boat-storming/">video released by the IDF</a> appears to show one soldier being tossed overboard amid a scuffle with unidentified individuals wielding melee weapons, like clubs and chairs.</p><p>However, in raw video captured by an Al Jazeera producer and published to YouTube late Monday, two journalists provide a play-by-play of the harrowing event as pops and cracks echo in the background. Even before the Israeli forces were aboard, one says, they were pelting the boat with tear gas and stun grenades, injuring numerous people.</p><p>Then he confirms the first death, saying the individual was killed by "munitions," but not specifying whether it was a bullet or something else. Then he confirms that Israeli forces were boarding the ship. <br /></p><p>Another of the reporters featured in the video works for the Iranian network Press TV. "We are being hit by tear gas, stun grenades, we have navy ships on either side, helicopters overhead," he said. "We are being attacked from every single side. This is in international waters, not Israeli waters, not in the 68-mile exclusion zone. We are being attacked in international waters completely illegally."</p><p>"The organizers are telling me now, they are raising a white flag -- they are raising a white flag to the Israeli army," the Al Jazeera reporter said. "This is after one person has been killed; a civilian has been killed by munition. That number could be more ... Despite the white flag being raised, despite the white flag being raised, the Israeli army is still shooting, still firing live munitions."</p></blockquote><p></p>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-30064601542771582932010-05-30T22:43:00.000-07:002010-05-30T22:59:54.206-07:00Israel attacks humanitarian flotilla - news from different sourcesAljazeera:<br /><img src="file:///Users/ksayood/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot-1.png" alt="" /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkxN37M8UmH3I3z1N5RgsWovqv7GnAv9gzdZ27mBeVohvQLe9VCmtyQxxaMoGGYQYjXTUZSjoLtmAGXnDVFX_0G0ItiQVlrWTFrwKc-3sgEd_VeQJcn76iHiepmgMz0VIwIq0bc9ueOO75/s1600/alj.png"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 440px; height: 239px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkxN37M8UmH3I3z1N5RgsWovqv7GnAv9gzdZ27mBeVohvQLe9VCmtyQxxaMoGGYQYjXTUZSjoLtmAGXnDVFX_0G0ItiQVlrWTFrwKc-3sgEd_VeQJcn76iHiepmgMz0VIwIq0bc9ueOO75/s320/alj.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5477307841721077282" border="0" /></a><br />CNN<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0Xnpd4MrDG5u6QFiCw_znnyCHL7QA_oWWlqwUSEAVqpEPWbjmhLuDhR6OPp6T5LKlz0TlwK28yBA5ViA1B3DNho163gdySaX4lbqdkdzMXaHc8EdOq_vqbedjjPqCpnQvQOldRkc2nxp9/s1600/cnn.png"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 410px; height: 198px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0Xnpd4MrDG5u6QFiCw_znnyCHL7QA_oWWlqwUSEAVqpEPWbjmhLuDhR6OPp6T5LKlz0TlwK28yBA5ViA1B3DNho163gdySaX4lbqdkdzMXaHc8EdOq_vqbedjjPqCpnQvQOldRkc2nxp9/s320/cnn.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5477308768662994866" border="0" /></a>NPR<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9IiQZh4N0DEKge1kFqFQHHp9x7QQSwR_Sw92v3MkpO097gwPiIKiWCNC5j3ntIoSi7_P4B4PYpKZYv63fKH01ZfsukSfUQICRo8w3ji1I40lPA2gm5p90hUbZwJsxlyRjyWS7sk6pbWGz/s1600/npr.png"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 454px; height: 241px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9IiQZh4N0DEKge1kFqFQHHp9x7QQSwR_Sw92v3MkpO097gwPiIKiWCNC5j3ntIoSi7_P4B4PYpKZYv63fKH01ZfsukSfUQICRo8w3ji1I40lPA2gm5p90hUbZwJsxlyRjyWS7sk6pbWGz/s320/npr.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5477309268927093266" border="0" /></a>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-16668192242787386072010-05-25T20:28:00.000-07:002010-05-25T20:56:58.928-07:00Heckuva job Kenny<blockquote>It turns out, by the way, that oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills. They are technologically very advanced. Even during Katrina, the spills didn’t come from the oil rigs, they came from the refineries onshore.</blockquote><div style="text-align: right;">Barack Obama, April 2, 2010<br /></div><br /><blockquote>"For too long, for a decade or more, there has been a cozy relationship between the oil companies and the federal agency that permits them to drill. It seems as if permits were too often issued based on little more than assurances of safety from the oil companies. That cannot and will not happen anymore.<br />...<br />Now, from the day he took office as Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar has recognized these problems and he's worked to solve them. Often times he has been slammed by the industry, suggesting that somehow these necessary reforms would impede economic growth. Well, as I just told Ken, we are going to keep on going to do what needs to be done.</blockquote><div style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20005039-503544.html">Barack Obama, May 14, 2010</a><br /></div><p></p><blockquote><p>Just last year BP—who now likes to say BP stands for “Beyond Petroleum,” not British Petroleum—told the government that an oil spill like the one wreaking havoc in the Gulf was highly unlikely, so they didn’t need to install the remote controlled valves that could prevent an uncontrolled blowout.</p> <p>Obama’s Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar, was so taken-in by these false safety claims that his agency allowed BP’s offshore drilling plan to be “categorically excluded” from the required environmental impact review. Kierán Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said, “Instead of protecting the public interest by conducting environmental reviews, Salazar’s agency rubber stamped BP’s drilling plan, just as it does hundreds of others every year in the Gulf of Mexico.</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2010/05/the-dementia-of-petroleum-addiction/">Cambridgeblog</a><br /></p><a href="http://www.sunherald.com/2010/05/07/2164885/since-spill-feds-have-given-27.html"></a><blockquote><a href="http://www.sunherald.com/2010/05/07/2164885/since-spill-feds-have-given-27.html">Since</a> the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling rig exploded on April 20, the Obama administration has granted oil and gas companies at least 27 exemptions from doing in-depth environmental studies of oil exploration and production in the Gulf of Mexico.<p> The waivers were granted despite President Barack Obama’s vow that his administration would launch a “relentless response effort” to stop the leak and prevent more damage to the gulf. One of them was dated Friday — the day after Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said he was temporarily halting offshore drilling </p></blockquote><p></p><div style="text-align: right;" id="story_bycredit"> <a href="http://www.sunherald.com/2010/05/07/2164885/since-spill-feds-have-given-27.html"><span class="byline">Marisa Taylor</span> - <span class="creditline">McClatchy Newspapers</span></a> </div>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-41985684962120436082010-05-21T20:11:00.000-07:002010-05-21T20:24:20.933-07:00The War is Making You Poor BillAlan Grayson keeps it simple (h/t <a href="http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2010/05/war-is-making-you-poor.html">John Ballard</a>) .<br /><br /><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yngFRt7s0QM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yngFRt7s0QM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="385" width="480"></embed></object>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800151291819589847.post-18439313709569157382010-05-16T21:04:00.000-07:002010-05-16T21:15:47.227-07:00Chomsky bannedNoam Chomsky and his daughter were denied entry by the Israelis on the Jordan/Israeli border. Here is an interview he gave to Al Jazeera. The interviewer is highly annoying. Chomsky is Chomsky.<br /><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s0vvaNM9J0U&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s0vvaNM9J0U&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>emptyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14074915209346940856noreply@blogger.com0